Open iT désigné « leader » dans le classement QKS SPARK Matrix™ 2025
Télécharger le rapport complet

Pourquoi la valeur d'un logiciel dépend du point de vue adopté, et comment les entreprises l'alignent 

Tableau de bord Open iT permettant de visualiser la valeur des logiciels grâce à l'analyse des données d'utilisation, facilitant les renouvellements, la gestion des licences logicielles, la conformité, la gouvernance, la gestion des coûts, la préparation aux audits et la prise de décisions éclairées en matière de logiciels.
Principaux enseignements
  • La valeur d'un logiciel dépend du point de vue des différentes parties prenantes, notamment les services financiers, informatiques, d'ingénierie, des achats et les utilisateurs finaux.
  • Les entreprises ont besoin d'indicateurs communs pour concilier coûts logiciels, productivité, conformité et valeur opérationnelle.
  • Les données d'utilisation permettent de faire converger différents points de vue autour d'une valeur logicielle mesurable.

La valeur d’un logiciel dépend du point de vue de l’utilisateur : une licence qui apporte une valeur significative à une équipe peut rester sous-utilisée par une autre équipe au sein de la même entreprise. C’est en harmonisant ces points de vue que les entreprises parviennent à tirer pleinement parti de la valeur que le logiciel était censé apporter. Des données d'utilisation documentées, une répartition transparente des coûts et la couche analytique qui facilite le dialogue sur la valeur entre les différentes divisions permettent de transformer ce problème de perspective en un enjeu maîtrisé. Open iT positionne « LicenseAnalyzer » comme la plateforme qui harmonise la valeur des logiciels d’entreprise grâce à la visibilité, à la transparence et à la rigueur de gestion que ce travail d’harmonisation exige.

Most enterprise software decisions don’t fail because of a lack of data. They fail because software value means different things to different people.

Finance, IT, and engineering all evaluate software through distinct lenses. Each perspective is valid. Each reflects real responsibility. Yet when decisions require alignment—as they increasingly do, those differences often slow progress, stall renewals, or lead to conservative decisions that inflate cost and risk.

This challenge is becoming more urgent. According to Boston Consulting Group (BCG), cost management has been the top priority for executives for three consecutive years, with software spend playing an increasingly visible role in enterprise cost structures — even though many organizations still struggle to turn intent into measurable outcomes.

At the same time, macro trends show that IT spending overall continues to accelerate. Gartner forecasts that worldwide IT spending will grow 10.8% in 2026 to reach an estimated $6.15 trillion, driven by investments in software, data centers, and AI-related infrastructure. Software alone is expected to exceed $1.4 trillion in total spend.

In today’s environment of tighter budgets, larger buying groups, and constant scrutiny, organizations are learning an important lesson: software value is not absolute—it is contextual.

CONNECTEZ-VOUS : Transformez les débats sur la valeur des logiciels en décisions fondées sur des données.

Same Tools, Different Definitions of Software Value

Enterprise software touches many functions, but each experiences its value differently.

Finance departments evaluate software value through cost control, avoided spend, predictability, and return on investment. Software that cannot be clearly justified becomes a liability—especially during budget cycles and renewals.

IT teams look at value through governance and risk. Value means compliance with licensing agreements, audit readiness, and the ability to manage complex environments without increasing exposure.

Engineering experiences value operationally. Software is valuable when teams have timely access to the right tools and productivity is not constrained by license shortages or bottlenecks.

These perspectives rarely conflict in isolation. The challenge emerges when they must converge—during renewals, audits, or strategic planning.

WEBINAIRE: La valeur des logiciels varie selon les services financiers, informatiques et d'ingénierie. Regardez «La valeur cachée de la gestion des actifs logiciels» pour découvrir comment l'intelligence d'utilisation permet de concilier ces perspectives et de prendre des décisions fiables, fondées sur des données.

Dévoiler la valeur cachée grâce à la gestion des actifs logiciels

Pourquoi le désalignement est devenu un problème plus important

Software costs have also risen as a share of total IT spend. In many enterprises, software now accounts for over 20% of IT budgets, driven by SaaS proliferation, complex licensing models, and vendor consolidation.

At the same time, global IT investment continues to grow — even as organizations tighten cost controls. Gartner’s forecast shows that overall spending on software and IT services is rising faster than many other categories, reflecting ongoing digital transformation efforts and persistent demand for new capabilities.

This mix — rising spend, expanding budgets, and increasing scrutiny — puts alignment pressure on organizations. When finance questions spend that engineering sees as essential — or when IT flags compliance risks others underestimate — decisions slow down. Organizations often have the data needed to resolve these debates, but not in a way that supports all perspectives equally.

L'alignement ne signifie pas forcer tout le monde à se soucier des mêmes indicateurs. Cela signifie fonder les décisions sur des preuves communes, tout en permettant à chaque partie prenante d'interpréter ces preuves à travers son propre prisme.

This challenge is not unique to software. Misalignment between finance and procurement often stems from limited visibility, late engagement, and competing priorities, leading to inefficiencies in cash flow management and planning.

In a 2025 article from the Forbes Business Council, misalignment is described as a “silent killer of growth and culture”—not because teams don’t want the same outcomes, but because lack of shared language and operational clarity creates friction, resistance, and ambiguity. Leaders are advised to create common frameworks, codify alignment processes, and institutionalize shared objectives so that misalignment doesn’t quietly erode progress.

Many organizations respond by maintaining separate reports for each group or by presenting the same generic dashboards to everyone. Both approaches undermine trust. What’s needed is a single, trusted foundation of data, paired with role-specific insight.

Open iT, a pioneer in software license management for engineering, specialty, and enterprise software and SaaS solutions, helps organizations achieve this crucial alignment. By collecting and normalizing actual software usage data across engineering and enterprise environments, Open iT provides a consistent source of truth that different stakeholders can rely on—without fragmenting the story.

Un ensemble de données, plusieurs perspectives

Lorsque tout le monde fait confiance aux mêmes données sous-jacentes, les conversations changent.

Finance can view software usage in terms of financial exposure, avoided cost, and predictability—without questioning the validity of the numbers. IT can assess governance and compliance risks using the same data, confident it will stand up during audits. Engineering can see how licenses are actually used in practice, rather than relying on assumptions or averages.

Organizations with disconnected workflows and competing KPIs struggle to sustain alignment, even when leadership recognizes the problem. The same principle applies to software decisions: alignment improves only when teams share visibility and accountability.

Open iT’s role-based reporting supports this approach by presenting insights differently depending on the audience—while keeping the underlying data consistent. The result is not more reports, but clearer conversations.

À quoi ressemble l'alignement dans la pratique ?

When perspectives are aligned, software discussions become more productive.

Finance gains confidence that spend is defensible and future needs are based on evidence, not estimates. Usage trends support renewal discussions and long-term planning.

IT gains visibility into compliance and governance without adding manual effort. Risk is identified earlier, and audit preparation becomes less disruptive.

L'ingénierie apporte plus de transparence sur les modèles d'accès et de demande, ce qui aide les équipes à éviter les goulots d'étranglement tout en favorisant une allocation plus intelligente.

Because these insights are grounded in the same usage data—often provided through solutions like Open iT—discussions focus on decisions rather than reconciliation.

From Internal Friction to Decision Confidence

When organizations fail to align perspectives, decisions default to caution. Licenses are over-purchased “just in case.” Optimization initiatives are postponed. Renewals become defensive exercises.

Les organisations alignées se comportent différemment.

They approach renewals with clarity. They identify risks and opportunities earlier. They can explain not just what they are spending, but why that spend makes sense—now and in the future.

Cette distinction est importante. BCG rapporte que moins de la moitié des programmes de réduction des coûts atteignent pleinement leurs objectifs, souvent en raison de difficultés d'exécution et d'un manque de coordination interne, et non d'un manque de volonté.

Software Value Is a Conversation, Not a Metric

Software value is not a single number. It is a conversation—between stakeholders with different responsibilities, pressures, and priorities.

That conversation works best when everyone starts from the same facts.

By grounding discussions in accurate, normalized usage data and presenting insights in ways that resonate with each role, organizations can turn competing perspectives into confident decisions.

Tools like Open iT are not the headline of this story—but they are often the enabler behind it, providing the evidence layer that allows alignment to happen.

Aligner les perspectives est le véritable défi

If software decisions in your organization feel slower or harder to justify than they used to be, the issue may not be cost or usage. It may be misaligned perspectives.

Open iT helps enterprises establish a shared foundation for understanding software usage—so finance, IT, and engineering can align around value with confidence.

Contact Open iT to explore how shared evidence can turn perspective into clarity.

Discutez avec un expert Open iT.

Marie Jane Valdez est ingénieure solutions avant-vente chez Open iT. Elle est spécialisée dans la gestion des actifs logiciels et les solutions d'entreprise. Elle aide les organisations à maximiser la valeur de leurs investissements logiciels grâce à son expertise stratégique et technique. Son expérience couvre le conseil, la conception de solutions techniques et l'ingénierie axée sur le client.

WEBINAIRE
Enregistrement à la demande disponible.
Regarder
Défiler vers le haut

Parlons-en

Nous vous montrerons comment votre entreprise peut bénéficier des solutions Open iT.
Veuillez noter :
En soumettant ce formulaire, vous acceptez de recevoir des communications supplémentaires de la part d'Open iT. Vos informations seront traitées conformément à notre avis de confidentialité.